Recommended Movies #2

If you haven't see the last recommendation blog post, click here.

Theater: Guardians of the Galaxy (seen it)

It's a superhero movie. It's also a comedy. Those two things don't usually go together, but for some reason, it worked. Guardians of the Galaxy's main cast work so well together that the scenes where the five of them converse are the best scenes in the movie. What didn't work? The secondary characters. The villains are one big joke with all their crazy makeup and cliche' lines. But the problem is, that joke, unlike the ones uttered by the main cast, isn't one that the movie's creators wanted to tell. I'll give it 6/10.

Rental: Alan Partridge (seen it)

One of the funniest movies I've seen in awhile. I'm going to leave it at that. 7/10

How Much is Too Much: Entering Competitions

As those who read my equipment blog post would know, I enter the I Shot It competition regularly. They have a very large range of contests ranging from cats to transportation, and the awards are very generous (money plus Leica equipment). But the problem I've run into is that I have too many things to enter. Some of my photos fit into more than three competitions, but it would be too costly (there's a charge to enter) to enter every good photograph into all contests it would fit into. To get my head around how much money I should spend, I need to look at it from a statistical perspective.

Warning! Math ahead! Skip the next paragraph if you don’t feel like having your brain explode.

For example: the last city-themed competition had 172 submissions. With this information, you could conclude that I have a 1 in 172 chance of winning the big prize. But to go any further, you must think about the quality of the photograph. If you assume that all my work is the same in quality (which is, of course, not true), then you can take a look back at my previous winnings. I got a mark of excellence a month ago, 1 out of 32. For that competition, there were 972 submissions. That means that there was a mark of excellence for every 29 photos. This basically means that there is possibly a picture better than mine every 29 photos. If you use this logic on the city-themed contest, then I have a 1 in 6 chance of getting a mark of excellence and a 1 in 48 chance of winning the big prize (there were only 8 marks of excellence for the city-themed contest). 

Now, keep in mind that this doesn’t take into account other variables such as the judges’ varying taste, other competition, and the quality of each photograph individually, instead of the quality of one photograph in my portfolio being the quality of all the rest. To sum up the calculations, I have a 1 in 6 chance of getting a mark of excellence and a 1 in 48 chance of getting the top spot in the city-themed contest.

So then I am left with the final question, do I spend six dollars at a 1 in 48 chance of winning 200 to 350 dollars? Also, is six dollars worth getting a 1 in 6 chance of getting a little prestige and some website traffic (the winners’ page allows a mark of excellence winner to put a link to their website)? I say yes to both questions.

 

Recommended Movies

Every so often, I plan to post on my blog a suggestion or suggestions to go see in theaters or to rent. They'll all be recently released. I won't guarantee that I've seen what I suggest, but I'll see them soon after I post its recommendation.


Theater: Boyhood (seen it)

Seen it. Loved it. Recommend it. Side note: I can't put it in my movie rankings quite yet because I feel I need to watch it a second time. This movie is long, and so to confidently put it in a position on my list, I need to remember the whole movie.

Rental: Jodorowsky's Dune (not seen it)

I haven't gotten a chance to sit down and watch this. Jodorowosky's Dune never was available in a movie theater near me. I've watched the trailer a couple times more than the normal person watches trailers, so I guess I'm excited to see this movie. Click here to rent.